@Article{MancoMend:2019:CoStDi,
author = "Manco, Jhonatan Andr{\'e}s Aguirre and Mendon{\c{c}}a,
M{\'a}rcio Teixeira",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Comparative study of diferent non\‑refecting boundary
conditions for compressible fows",
journal = "Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and
Engineering",
year = "2019",
volume = "41",
number = "10",
pages = "UNSP 411",
month = "Oct.",
keywords = "PML, Non-reflecting boundary conditions, High-order numerical
methods, Euler equations, Hydrodynamic stability.",
abstract = "The numerical simulation of hydrodynamic stability and
aeroacoustic problems requires the use of high-order,
low-dispersion and low-dissipation numerical methods. It also
requires appropriate boundary conditions to avoid reflections of
outgoing waves at the boundaries of the computational domain.
There are many different methods to avoid wave reflection at the
boundaries such as the buffer zone and boundary conditions based
on characteristic equations. This paper considers the use of a
methodology called perfectly matched layer (PML). The PML is
evaluated for the simulation of an acoustic pulse in a uniform
flow and the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in a mixing layer using
the linear and nonlinear form of the Euler equation. PML results
are compared with other non-reflecting boundary condition methods
in terms of effectiveness and computational cost. The other
non-reflecting boundary conditions implemented were the buffer
zone (BZ), widely used in aeroacoustic and hydrodynamic problems,
and the energy transfer and annihilation (ETA), a very simple
boundary condition to be implemented. The results show that the
PML is an effective boundary condition method, but can be
computationally expensive. The PML is also more complex to
implement and requires careful stability analysis. The other
boundary conditions, the BZ and the ETA, are also effective and
may perform better than the PML depending on the flow conditions.
These two methods have an advantage in terms of robustness and are
much simpler to implement than the PML.",
doi = "10.1007/s40430-019-1915-4",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1915-4",
issn = "1678-5878",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Manco_comparative.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}